News & Info

Which Jesus Do You Believe in?

The election is almost over! (At least I hope so, since the alternative is a long drawn out legal battle over recounts, and I really don’t want us to go there again.) Anyway, an editorial on CNN caught my eye, Do You Believe in a Red State Jesus or a Blue State Jesus. It’s a fundamentally misguided article based on a flawed premise. However, it does make a point, even if it’s not the one it intended to make.

The premise of the editorial is that everyone picks and chooses which teachings of Jesus to follow, and it identifies a conservative “Red State Jesus” and a liberal “Blue State Jesus.” It certainly is true that people in our culture tend to pick and choose the biblical teachings we like, and downplay or even completely disregard others. The two presidential candidates, for example, seem to believe in radically different “Jesuses.” One appears to believe in Jesus of liberal Christianity the other the Jesus of Mormonism. The concept of competing “Jesuses” which is presented in the editorial is largely captured in the following quote:

 ”Jesus didn’t leave clear instructions,” says Molly Worthern, a history professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who specializes in religious history.

“He was a man who said many things that were quite cryptic. All Christians tend to pick or chose to emphasize some of his teachings over the other.”

This editorial makes a couple of logical errors, most notably, it commits the fallacy of bifurcation. For example, it says that Jesus most be either “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” or “the champion of the poor and the oppressed.” Anyone with even a passing familiarity with the Gospels should recognize this as a false dichotomy. The Jesus of the Bible is both. To choose one or the other is to ignore the real, historical, living Jesus and replace him with a more palatable idol of our own making.

This all reminds me of Joshua’s encounter with God before the battle of Jericho. A figure carrying a sword appears to Joshua. This text clearly presents him as a divine figure, as he later accepts Joshua’s worship. Many believe this is an appearance of the preincarnate Christ. Before finding out who he was, Joshua asked him whose side he was on, Israel or their enemy. In verse 14, he answers, “Neither, but as commander of the army of the Lord I have now come.” In other words, Joshua was asking the wrong question. The question is not whether or not God is on our side, but rather weather or not we on his.

This principle applies in the election as well. God is not weighing the pros and cons of Republicans verses Democrats to decide which side he’ll support. He is where he has always been, on his own side. The choice is ours. Each of us must decide whether or not we are willing join him on his terms.

Posted by Brad Brown, on
Category: Random Thoughts | 3 Comments

God’s Big Story

A generation or two ago, pretty much everyone in our culture was at least familiar with the basics of Christianity. People understood basic Christian concepts like truth, sin, and God and Jesus. You could simply tell people about Jesus, because they already had the background to understand. That’s no longer the case.

Sadly, it appears to me that even in the church, there are a growing number of Christians who have a very limited understanding of what the Bible really teaches. Kid’s ministries tend to just teach random Bible stories. Kids hear stories like David and Goliath, Noah and the Ark, Sampson and Delilah, and Daniel in the Lion’s Den, but they aren’t taught how these stories fit together or what they have to do with “real life.”

Even many Christian adults seem to have a limited understanding of the Bible as a whole. We tend to treat the Bible like a buffet where we can pick and choose what appeals to us. We tend to latch on to certain verses that appeal to us–whether or not those verses actually mean what we want them to in context– and ignore the rest.  (To be clear, I am not saying that this is the case for all American churches or believers, only that it seems to me to be increasingly common.)

I had this in mind when I started planning my new series of programs for kid’s camps and other similar events. I wanted to cover the basics of the faith, without making any assumptions that the members of the audience have preexisting foundational knowledge. The result is God’s Big Story, a series of eight programs designed to provide an overview of redemptive history, starting from the very beginning.

The first program simply introduces the series, and provides a general overview. The next deals with God’s story book, the Bible. It discusses where the Bible came from, and why it is trustworthy. Unlike a lot of stories that are made up, the Bible tells us the true story of God’s interaction with mankind throughout history. Most importantly, the program makes clear that everything that the Bible teaches is true.

The remainder of the programs tell a series of the major stories from the Bible. The first is creation. Creation tells us a lot about God, who he is, what he is like, and how we can know he’s real. Second, is the account of the fall, which teaches us about sin and why bad things happen in this life. The next program deals with the flood, which shows us just how serious God considers sin to be. Then, we jump ahead to the New Testament. The next program introduces Jesus. He is God. He has always existed and is the creator of the world. He chose to take on flesh and become a human being. The seventh program deals with the cross, and what Jesus did to pay the price for our sin. This program has the primary evangelistic focus of the series. The final program deals with the fact that the story isn’t over. Each of us gets to play a part in God’s Big Story, as it continues to unfold today.

This series is a major departure from all my previous series, in that it primarily takes a narrative approach rather than a systematic one. This approach has a number of advantages. It is easier to remember than a list of facts, and it makes it easier to see how it all fits together into a unified “big picture.” It also helps the hearers become “instant evangelists,” as it is simple to retell a story. It is interesting to note that this is the primary approach Jesus used, teaching through stories. In fact, approximately 75% of the Bible consists of stories!

I’d love to bring God’s Big Story to your group. If this would be a good fit for your group, let us know. We’d love to talk to you!

Posted by Brad Brown, on
Category: Ministry Philosophy, Programming | Leave a comment

My Faith is not Blind!

This post was inspired by a recent conversation in the comments of one of my YouTube videos with a non-Christian who insisted I had blind faith in God. I believe “blind faith” is completely unbiblical and utterly foolish. It is easy to accept that non-believers have a mistaken understanding of the nature of faith. However, I am constantly surprised at the number of people in the church who seem to think that believing without having a reason is somehow a virtue or even a requirement of being a Christian. It is not.

I believe the confusion stems from a problem of vocabulary. One of the definitions of the English word “faith” is believing something without proof. For many people, this is the first definition that comes to mind when discussing faith. There are some who do not even realize that there even are other definitions. Unfortunately, this is not what the Bible is referring to when it discusses faith.

The Greek word in the Bible that is translated “faith” is “pistis.” It means being convinced that something is true. It has the implication of being persuaded of the truth of something. The word also incorporates the idea of trust. “Believing without reason” is simply not one of the meanings of this Greek word. To take the “absence of proof” aspect of the English word “faith,” and insert it into Scripture where the Greek word “pistis” is used is reading something into Scripture that is simply not there. It is committing the logical fallacy of equivocation.

Nowhere does the Bible tell us to simply turn off out minds and believe. Instead, we are encouraged to love God with our minds (Mark 12:30). Instead of instructing us to believe without reasons, the Bible insists not only that we must have reasons, but must be ready to defend them (1 Peter 3:15). In Romans 1:20 and 2 Corinthians 4:4, Paul declares that it is the unbeliever who is ignoring the evidence, not the believer. The biblical mandate of having faith does not mean to ignore reason. Instead, it requires us to put our trust in God who has proved himself trustworthy over and over again. And that is perfectly reasonable!

Posted by Brad Brown, on
Category: Random Thoughts | Leave a comment

The Meaning of Scripture, Clear or Cloudy?

Page from GenesisThis weekend I watched a video of debate between some Christians with different views on creation. I’m not going to deal with specific views on creation in this post, even though it is an important topic. Instead, I want to share another thought I had after watching it. (Though, if you are wondering, I believe the Bible says what it means in Genesis, just like it does elsewhere. I feel no need to explain it away or keep quiet about it avoid controversy.)

When watching the debate, I tried to imagine how it would have been understood by an unbeliever with little or no grasp of Scripture, or a Christian who doesn’t know the Bible well. Unfortunately, I’m afraid viewers like this could have come out of the experience with a radical misunderstanding of the nature of the Bible. The problem began when one person started using what I would consider to be ”debating tricks” to muddy the water when he was confronted with scripture that, if interpreted in a straightforward manner, was contrary to his viewpoint. Unfortunately, it is much simpler to raise doubts than it is to resolve them. Let me give a few examples.

Sometimes he would say that the Hebrew word used in a passage can have multiple meanings. Now, his statement is quite true, words do have multiple meanings. However, there are rules of grammar that identify the appropriate meaning in a given context. We can’t just swap in whatever meaning fits our desired interpretation. I’m no Hebrew scholar, but I know enough to tell his argument was without merit To my knowledge, there are no reputable Hebrew scholars who would agree with his interpretation. However,it seemed effective from a debating standpoint. If his opponents let it go, many will assume he is correct. If they try to argue by delving into the rules of Hebrew grammar, the audience will most likely get bored and not follow.

Other times, he would basically ignore one Scripture passage by trying to deflect attention to another. Again, it’s true that we need to look at Scripture as a whole, and not pull passages out of context. However, I know the Bible well enough to tell that he was the one pulling verses out of context. But what about viewers who don’t know the Bible as well?  The format of the debate simply did not provide the opportunity to go through the passages he was using in context to provide the audience enough information to see this for themselves.

I could give other examples, like when he made patently false statements about what was in a given Bible passage. To win the debate in the minds of the audience, he really did not need to convince them that the Bible supported his view. He merely needed them to lack confidence that the plain, obvious interpretation was correct. Unfortunately, it only takes a few words to sew doubt and raise questions in people minds. It takes much more time to resolve doubts and meaningfully answer questions.

I suspect that many people left the debate with the idea that either the Bible is malleable, and can mean whatever the reader wants it to, or that it is simply too complex for the average person to understand. Neither is true.

First, the Bible means exactly and only what God intended it to mean when he inspired its writing. We do not get to reinterpret it to support our perspective. We are probably all guilty of making the mistake of deciding what we believe first, and then trying to find Bible verses to back up our view. However, this is not the way it should be. We need to allow the Word of God to transform us, not the other way around. I am reminded of the line from the old Rich Mullins song, Creed, “I did not make it, no it is making me. It is the very truth of God and not the invention of any man.” We should use Scripture to find out what God has to say, not to reinforce what we want to believe.

Secondly, the Bible really can be understood by “ordinary believers.” You don’t need to be a seminary educated scholar to understand the Bible. Certainly there are difficult parts. The apostle Peter said as much in 2 Peter 3:15-16,

Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction. (NIV)

However, the Bible also contains a lot of “low hanging fruit” that is easy to understand. More importantly, we as believers are not left on our own to figure out what the Bible says. We have the Holy Spirit to teach us. In John 14:26, Jesus said, “But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. (NIV).”

Don’t take my word for it. Dig into the Scriptures and see for yourself.

Posted by Brad Brown, on
Category: Random Thoughts | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Object Lesson: Reliability of the New Testament

It’s been a long time since I posted anything here. I hope you didn’t feel neglected! I’ve just been crazy busy. I’m done with seminary for the time being, so I’ve got a bit more time. (Not much, but enough to at least do a quick post.)

I needed to come up with a way to help illustrate some of the evidence for the reliability of Scripture. I was brainstorming and came up with an idea for an object lesson. The video should give you the general idea.

If you want to do something similar, here are some of the facts from the presentation.

AuthorTime Span Between Original and CopyNumber of CopiesAccuracy
Plato1,200 Years7-
Caesar1,000 Years10-
Aristotle1,400 Years49-
Homer (Iliad)500 Years64395%
New Testament30 Years5,60099.5%

The information for the New Testament in the table above is just for Greek manuscripts. There are another 19,000 or so manuscripts translated into other languages.

If you’d like to get more information on the manuscript evidence for the New Testament, here are a few links to get you started:

Manuscript Evidence for Superior New Testament Reliability

Manuscript Support for the Bible’s Reliability

The Bible’s Manuscript Evidence

Posted by Brad Brown, on
Category: Ministry Tools, Status Report, Video | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Site Menu